The Work Nobody Sees
Trial weekends are public. Training weeks are private. The gap between the two is where championships are actually won or lost, and after seventeen years of interviewing handlers and observing their methods, I can tell you this: what champions do between trials looks nothing like what most competitors assume.
The average trial handler trains when convenient, works on whatever problem surfaced at the last trial, and enters the next competition hoping things will go better. Champions operate on a different system entirely. Their training is deliberate, structured, and sometimes counterintuitive.
This is not about talent. I have watched enormously talented handlers plateau because their training habits could not support their ambitions. I have watched handlers of modest natural ability climb to Open finals because they trained smarter than everyone around them.
The Myth of More Hours
Let me dispel the most common misconception first: champions do not necessarily train more than other handlers. Some do. Many do not.
“I train less than people think,” admitted handler Alasdair MacRae after winning a major trial I covered in Oregon. “But when I train, I know exactly what I am working on and why. I am never just running sheep for the sake of running sheep.”
MacRae is not unusual among top handlers. The pattern I have observed is quality over quantity, not because it sounds nice as a training philosophy, but because dogs and sheep have limited tolerance for repetitive work.
A dog drilled on the same exercise for hours becomes dull. Sheep pushed repeatedly through the same movements become sour. The training environment degrades if you stay in it too long. Champions understand this and structure their sessions accordingly.
Session Length
Most top handlers I have interviewed work their dogs in sessions of 15-30 minutes. Some go shorter. Almost none go longer than 45 minutes on a single dog.
“After twenty minutes, my dog is not learning anymore. She is just repeating,” explained handler Beverly Lambert. “I would rather do three focused twenty-minute sessions across a week than one marathon on Saturday.”
This runs counter to what many amateur handlers do. I have visited training facilities where handlers work dogs for hours, running exercise after exercise, believing that more practice equals better results. Their dogs look tired. Their sheep look resentful. And the next trial result rarely reflects the hours invested.
The Training Plan
Champions train to a plan. Not a rigid, written schedule that cannot adapt, but a clear set of priorities that guide what happens in each session.

The plan typically derives from three sources:
Trial feedback: Score sheets from recent competitions reveal patterns. If a handler consistently loses points on the drive cross, that becomes a priority. Understanding how scoring works is essential for converting judge feedback into training objectives.
Trainer observation: Most serious competitors, even Open handlers, continue working with a trainer or mentor. A knowledgeable observer sees things the handler cannot feel from the post. They identify habits, compensations, and inefficiencies that the handler has normalized.
Developmental stage: Where the dog stands in its career determines what training emphasizes. A young dog building confidence needs different work than a seasoned dog maintaining sharpness. The trial class progression provides a framework for understanding what skills each competitive level demands.
Breaking the Plan
Good plans break when reality intervenes, and champions let them break without anxiety.
“I showed up Tuesday planning to work on his outrun, and the sheep were so heavy he could barely push them across the field,” handler Derek Fisher recounted. “So we worked on pushing power instead. The outrun can wait. The sheep told me what we needed to do.”
This flexibility distinguishes deliberate training from rigid training. The plan provides direction. The session provides information. When the two conflict, the information wins.
What They Work On
Having observed training sessions of dozens of successful handlers, I can identify common priorities that may surprise people.
Whistles and Timing
The amount of time elite handlers spend on whistle work is striking. Not just teaching commands, but refining timing, clarity, and consistency.
“My dog knows all the whistles,” said handler Amanda Milliken. “The question is whether I give the right whistle at the right moment. That is a handler problem, not a dog problem.”
She is right. At the Open level, dogs understand commands. What varies is how precisely handlers deliver them. A whistle half a second too early changes the dog’s line. A flanking command held slightly too long pushes the dog past the balance point. Champions practice their own mechanics as seriously as they train their dogs.
Shedding
Shedding, the separation of marked sheep from unmarked ones, is the element most handlers practice least and lose most points on in competition.
The reason for the training deficit is practical: shedding requires specific conditions that are harder to set up than outrun or drive work. You need marked and unmarked sheep, enough space, and a dog comfortable working in close quarters. Many handlers do not have convenient access to shedding practice.
Champions find a way. They arrange access to facilities with appropriate stock. They travel to clinics that emphasize close work. They practice the footwork and timing that shedding demands, because they know that when scores are close at a major trial, the shed often decides placement.
Weaknesses, Not Strengths
Perhaps the most consistent pattern among champions is their focus on weaknesses rather than strengths.
“It is tempting to practice what you are already good at because it feels good,” said trainer and handler Jack Knox. “But your competition score does not care about what you did well. It cares about what you did poorly.”
Amateur handlers often spend training sessions doing what their dogs enjoy and do well. The outrun looks great, so they practice outruns. The fetch is smooth, so they run fetches. Meanwhile, the drive remains mediocre and the pen remains a coin flip. They arrive at the next trial with the same weaknesses they had at the last one.
The Physical Component
Training is not exclusively about sheep work. Dogs are athletes, and champions treat them accordingly.
Conditioning
Herding dogs cover miles during a trial run, much of it at speed across uneven terrain. Conditioning matters, particularly for dogs competing on the major trial circuit where events can cluster into demanding weekends.
Most handlers I interviewed incorporate some form of physical conditioning: road walks, swimming, free running in safe areas, or structured fitness work. The specifics vary, but the principle is consistent. A fit dog is a more capable dog.
“I run my dogs three miles every morning whether we are training on sheep that day or not,” said one handler who competed at the National Finals. “By September, when the big trials start, they are in shape. Handlers who skip conditioning and wonder why their dogs fade in the third drive leg have only themselves to blame.”
Rest and Recovery
Equally important is what champions do not do: they do not overtrain.

Rest days are planned, not accidental. After a trial weekend, most top handlers give their dogs two or three days off before returning to training. After a hard training session, the next day is light or off entirely.
“My dog tells me when she needs a break,” said handler Denise Wall. “Ears not quite as forward, slower to the post, a little hesitation I do not normally see. I have learned to listen to that.”
Ignoring fatigue, physical or mental, leads to flat performances and, worse, injuries. The handlers who last in this sport for decades are the ones who learned early that rest is not laziness. It is strategy.
Training Locations
Where champions train is as deliberate as how they train.
Working the same field week after week creates patterns. Dogs learn the terrain. Sheep learn the routine. The training stops challenging anyone.
Successful handlers seek variety:
Different fields with different terrain, slopes, and obstacles. A dog that only works flat ground will struggle on a hilly trial course.
Different sheep with different temperaments, breeds, and experience levels. A dog that only works cooperative trial sheep will be overwhelmed by fresh range ewes. Building fluency with varied stock is directly connected to the art of reading sheep behavior under trial conditions, a skill that only develops through exposure to diverse flocks.
Different conditions including wind, rain, heat, and cold. Trials happen in all weather. Training should too. Understanding how weather, terrain, and course conditions shape trial outcomes reinforces why varied-condition training is not optional for serious competitors.
I visited a handler in Montana who deliberately trains at a facility with a creek running through the field. “It is annoying,” she admitted. “The sheep bunch up at the creek and refuse to cross sometimes. But every trial has some terrain feature that creates problems. My dog has seen problems before.”
The Mental Training
Champions also prepare mentally between trials, though few describe it in those terms.
Video review has become increasingly common. Handlers film their runs and study them afterward. What they see often differs from what they felt at the post.
“I thought my dog was pushing too hard on the drive,” one handler told me. “Watching the video, he was fine. I was the one creating pressure by over-commanding. I never would have seen that without the footage.”
Visualization is practiced by some handlers, though the sport’s culture does not embrace it openly. Several handlers admitted privately that they walk through runs mentally before competing, imagining the course, the sheep, and the sequences of commands.
Post-trial analysis is perhaps the most valuable mental exercise. Champions debrief their runs honestly. They resist blaming the sheep, the judge, or bad luck. They identify what they controlled and whether they controlled it well.
“After every trial, I write down three things I did well and three things I need to fix,” shared a handler who has been to the National Finals multiple times. “It is simple but it forces honesty. Most handlers skip this because they do not want to confront what went wrong.”
The Common Mistakes
In contrast to championship training methods, I see amateur handlers consistently making several mistakes:
Training without purpose. Going to the field and “working the dog” without specific goals produces random improvement at best and bad habits at worst.
Avoiding difficulty. Choosing easy sheep, flat fields, and comfortable conditions because they produce pleasant sessions. Training should be harder than trialing, not easier.
Ignoring the handler’s role. Treating training as something you do to the dog rather than something you do together. Handler mechanics, decision-making, and timing need practice too.
Skipping rest. Training every day because daily practice feels virtuous. Dogs need recovery time. Sheep need recovery time. Handlers who train daily often see diminishing returns they attribute to the dog rather than the schedule.
Isolating from feedback. Training alone without any external input. Even experienced handlers develop blind spots. The assessment standards established by organizations like Working Dog Standards underscore how important objective evaluation criteria are for measuring progress accurately.
What You Can Start Tomorrow
If your training between trials consists of showing up and working sheep until someone gets tired, changing that pattern will produce results.
Start by reviewing your last three score sheets. Identify the phase where you consistently lose the most points. Make that phase your primary training focus for the next two weeks. Work on it in short, purposeful sessions. Then compete and compare.
This single change, training deliberately instead of randomly, accounts for more improvement than any equipment purchase, breeding decision, or training facility upgrade.
The champions I have covered are not superhuman. They are disciplined. Their dogs are not supernatural. They are prepared. The difference between a handler who peaks at Pro-Novice and one who reaches the National Finals often comes down to what happens on the days nobody is watching. This holds true regardless of breed, though the training demands differ. Handlers working with breeds other than Border Collies face additional challenges in training for USBCHA-level competition, but the principles of deliberate, structured preparation apply equally.
Train like someone is keeping score. Because eventually, someone will be.